The Gaming Industry
Daily Report
The Gaming Industry
Weekly Report
The Gaming Sector... Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
The Daily Lodging Report
North America
The Daily Lodging Report
Asia–Pacific
  Annual Model Portfolio
Back To Homepage
Lodging Stock Model Portfolio




































































Annual Model Portfolio


2010 Model Portfolio

Gaming stock investors were smiling in 2009 as despite a lot of volatility, it was a solid rebound off of what was arguably the worst year in history (2008) to be invested in these names. 2009 was also one of those rare periods where both casino and supplier stocks ended the year strongly in positive territory, not only showing the oversold condition they ended 2008 in but also that there was more money on the sidelines than anyone expected.

As we said earlier, for 9 months of 2009, gaming stock investors were having a party but the first quarter definitely tested everyone’s reserve. The era of easy money which fueled a building boom, extremely high debt levels and unrealistic asset valuations came crashing down to reality in the first quarter of 2009. For two years we had discussed how the “newbies” to the casino industry had infiltrated the Strip and how this was a sign of the irrational exuberance we were looking out for. It was quite fitting that by the end of 2009 all those Newbies were basically either leaving Las Vegas with their tails tucked between their legs, stuck with land with a cost basis that may never be reached again, or on their way to an exit as their creditors take control.

Elad Group’s purchase of the Frontier was the Top of the Market, just as we had predicted but it wasn’t just Elad who was leaving money on the table in Las Vegas. Legendary real estate investors and some over-zealous hedge fund investors lost hundreds of millions in companies like Riviera Holdings and land purchases. The Planet Hollywood group was ending 2009 halfway out the door, learning a painful lesson that owning a casino is not as easy as it looks. “Newbies” who rolled the dice on the Sahara and Hooters casinos in LV were pretty much wishing they could turn back time. Everyone knows now that Jeff Soffer’s dream of turning the El Rancho into Fontainebleau ran into the proverbial brick wall while the Cosmopolitan continues to show why we say it is cursed, inflicting financial pain on anyone who comes in contact with it. The rusting steel at Echelon Place shows that even guys in the business can get caught up in the moment and of course, Colony Capital is about 2/3rds of the way out of the entire U.S. casino business. As legendary as they are in the real estate business, they did overstay their welcome in the casino biz. While Colony was a coast to coast casino owner for many years, they only had one successful casino investment in all those years and that was Harveys Casino Resorts more than a decade ago. Colony has the luxury of being the first casino owner to turn the keys of the casino to a lender rather than go through a bankruptcy. While common in the hotel business, their decision to walk away from Resorts AC is a first there.

Following those massive declines in casino stock valuations in March of 2009 when push came to shove for CityCenter/MGM and Las Vegas Sands, investors found out just why it makes more sense to be a public casino company than one owned by private equity. There were more bankruptcies involving casino companies or individual casinos in 2009 than ever before yet only one was a public company. That company is Trump Entertainment Resorts, a name that would have shown up on the top of anyone’s list as the most likely public casino company to declare bankruptcy. The Chapter 11 filings over the past 12-15 months of Herbst Gaming, Station Casinos, Majestic Star, and Tropicana Entertainment, to name a few, and the way MGM and LVS were able to come back from the brink of bankruptcy shows why public casino companies have an advantage and that is public equity. Both MGM and LVS were able to stay afloat with painful at the time, but necessary, public offerings of stock. Investors in those offerings made quite a return as LVS quadrupled in price from the offering price and MGM nearly doubled. Wynn Resorts sold equity to shore up their balance sheet, also giving those investors a fine return. Regional gaming companies like Ameristar Casinos, Isle of Capri Casinos, Penn National and Pinnacle Entertainment were able to either buy back their debt well below par, or renegotiate or refinance credit lines or other debt facilities, taking advantage of their more resilient operations, ending the year in much better financial shape than they started. Once again it was the public regional casino companies which received a much warmer reception from investors.

While the majority of the regional gaming areas had a decent year, as compared with their resort destination areas, there were still numerous casinos that end 2009 either in bankruptcy, behind in their debt payments or about to have an ownership change as a result of Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. It was in last year’s issue that we predicted between 6 and 10 casinos in Atlantic City could be part of a bankruptcy or in financial trouble. As we end the year Tropicana AC is about to have a change in ownership to Carl Icahn and the reorganized Tropicana Entertainment, three Trump Entertainment properties are in Chapter 11, Resorts was foreclosed on with the lenders taking over and AC Hilton hasn’t made any debt payments in months. Harrah’s Entertainment was able to avoid major financial issues with constant debt swaps and refinancings leaving only Borgata in decent shape. Is it any wonder why we feel Atlantic City is one of, if not the, worst gaming market in the United States?

Over in Asia, Wynn Resorts and Las Vegas Sands took advantage of a strong Hong Kong IPO market to conduct Initial Public Offerings of their Macau units, raising nearly $7 billion between selling equity and some bank financing. Those offerings not only raised them capital that they need to continue to expand their Macau empire, it validated the valuations their parent company was trading at, shoring up the overall balance sheet of the parent and also giving their Macau assets a valid public valuation.

For investors, the gaming industry ends 2009 and starts 2010 with a much better financial outlook than a year ago. While that seems a strange thing to say considering the increase in bankrupt casinos and casino companies out there, we remind you that this does not impact the public companies as much. We believe that with the exception of a few, most of the public casino companies are no longer at risk of bankruptcy. This is a big difference from the end of 2008 when Wall Street was pointing to Penn National Gaming as the only company they had absolutely no concerns over.

Trump Entertainment Resorts may finally be put out of its misery as a public company in this third reorganization. With CityCenter just opening as we go to press, we have to include MGM Mirage as a company that could once again be teetering on financial collapse if CityCenter cannot be profitable. We expect Riviera Holdings to disappear from the public markets once Wachovia decides what they should do with the assets. Wachovia has been giving Riviera a lot of time considering they have been in default for like 6 months. The other company that could be facing financial issues in the next 18 months or so is MTR Gaming. Right now every one of MNTG’s casinos faces a competitive threat. Table games being legalized may help Presque Isle Downs but will hurt their Mountaineer Park Casino in West Virginia even more than it benefits Presque Isle. The only chance MNTG has at Presque Isle is if the Ohio casinos from PENN and Dan Gilbert get delayed for years, bogged down in political and legal red tape. While that may give MNTG a short life line, the only way we see MNTG making it is if Ohio can somehow allow slots at tracks either well in advance of the PENN/Gilbert casinos being opened or in place of them. MNTG is a classic example of why we believe ignorance has become bliss in the corporate bond market when it comes to casinos.

For many years we wondered how so many gaming equity investors can do so without strong knowledge of the industry. We pointed to the direction of gaming junk bonds for investors to really gauge the profitability of a casino or casino company. All that has changed as we have seen debt investors willing to invest billions in pipe dreams such as the purchase of Aztar Corp. by Columbia Entertainment, Herbst Gaming’s strategy of buying low margin/profit casinos across the country, privatizations of Harrah’s and Station Casinos at such high valuations and the biggest red flag of all, the purchase of notes in MTR Gaming both before and after the mess with slots at tracks in Ohio occurred and table games were on their way in Pennsylvania.

Obviously there are always times when investments do not turn out right in casinos or casino companies but in the past three years we have seen investors in publicly traded debt, across all different industries, throw money at many deals that made no sense at all. In the casino business this has been a lot easier to spot because of how valuations in transactions like the purchase of Aztar or the purchase of the Frontier by Elad Group had risen to unrealistic levels. Of all the classes of investors, those in debt securities felt a lot of pain in 2009 and may feel even more in 2010 in terms of the gaming business. It seems right now that unsecured creditors who receive pennies on the dollar in these reorganizations may wind up lucky because many of these deals will result in a total loss.

Just about every reorganization, even the ones that are supposed to have been agreed upon beforehand, are taking much longer than expected. Unsecured creditors are fighting tooth and nail for any scraps they can get. In many cases, warrants or slivers of equity may be given. The end result of all this may be many of these companies going public again. We are already seeing it in the lodging arena as many veteran executives who sold out their public companies during the private equity craze have raised money in the past year or are filing for IPOs. If we were to see this happen in the gaming industry again it would be a good thing as we have seen a change in this industry from an investor standpoint. If Carl Icahn can accomplish what we think he is trying to do, basically corner the market for distressed casinos, his exit strategy may be an IPO when the economy recovers. We believe he may wind up having to close some properties, such as a Trump casino or two if he is successful at winning the Trump bankruptcy, or a casino like Horizon in Vicksburg for Tropicana Entertainment.

We don’t believe there are enough public casino companies out there, especially with the opportunity that is becoming available to those with liquidity. While we believe there are too many casinos concentrated in certain areas such as the Eastern part of the U.S., this is only going to get worse as new markets such as Kansas, Maryland, and Ohio open their first casinos and established markets such as Pennsylvania and Delaware add additional game opportunities such as table games and sports betting and also open new casinos. While we are confident the end result is going to be some cherry picking of casinos, where many which need capital investment and are subject to competition wind up being closed, these reorganizations will delay this inevitable situation as bondholders and banks try to salvage their investment by taking over control of these properties. They will then hire management companies or other casino companies, something that will be quite profitable for those getting the contracts but not something that will help the oversupply. Eventually these owners are going to want to convert their equity to cash and will begin to sell off casinos or the whole company. It is then that a buyer may choose to close certain competing properties to make their operations more profitable overall rather than trying to go against common sense.

Isle of Capri Casinos is the public company we believe with the best chance to get some of these management contracts as their management has proven over and over again that they can operate in the most difficult markets. There are quite a few gaming executives from Harrah’s and other casino companies who have also formed management companies so competition will be fierce. At the same time these new owners will decide whether to sell or go public with their assets and that is when the opportunity will be created for the liquid companies and investors.

We are seeing a sort of chess game being played and it looks like the casino space could be dominated by a few companies in the future. Carl Icahn is showing he is making a coast to coast move to take advantage of the depressed valuations and financial troubles in the industry. Between Tropicana Entertainment, Fontainebleau and Trump Entertainment, he could have ownership of casinos in the majority of markets in the U.S. Genting is making its move in the U.S. between tribal casinos and racinos and potential new markets. In addition they have taken equity stakes and purchased debt in offerings from MGM and Wynn Resorts. PENN not only is still looking out for acquisitions but also has Greenfield projects in every new market that has been legalized. Isle of Capri Casinos may get management control of quite a few casinos that come out of Chapter 11 and was reported by Dealwire to be named as a potential manager of some of the Station Casinos properties by some if the bankruptcy proceedings go that way. Boyd Gaming’s interest in owning some or all of Station Casinos shows they would like to dominate the local Las Vegas market. We are quite sure that Wynn Resorts would be right there showing an interest if companies like MGM or Harrah’s would need to get rid of higher end properties such as Bellagio, Mirage, MGM Grand or Caesars and of course Las Vegas Sands has made it clear they want to be the primary name when thinking about Asian high end casinos. Harrah’s seems to want everyone to know they are still out there looking for opportunities no matter which high yield analysts or newsletters declares them toast. As 2009 came to a close this all began to unfold.

As for these competitive markets, we continue to believe that the only two that are hopeless are Atlantic City and Illinois. AC has half of their casinos which either need billions of investment or should just close up. The only way we can see Revel Entertainment making it is if we see 3 or 4 of the existing casinos close up shop. With table games coming in Pennsylvania and Delaware and the Aqueduct license in NY eventually being granted, things will only get worse. What bothers us the most about this market is that casino executives, local and state governments continue to be in denial about the situation. They hold summits, Revel executives point fingers at who is to blame but the reality is that there is only one way to change it and that is to reduce the number of positions and only have the quality ones remain. Borgata, Trump Taj Mahal, Harrah’s Marina, Caesars, Revel and perhaps the Tropicana in Atlantic City would all be profitable if the rest of the casinos would close and become condos or just hotels, convention and retail space. The remaining gaming space and the increase in retail and other non-gaming amenities would be a nice balance with the reality of what the market is today. Unfortunately we think it will take until Pennsylvania gets table games and everyone sees how bad it is in the summer of 2010 before this becomes apparent to those who are closest to the situation.

As for Illinois, this market was destroyed by a combination of the actions of the state government in regards to taxes, fees and smoking bans and the actions of some of the casinos made things even worse. Despite declines of more than 30% in the Chicago-area casino revenue in the past 2 years, another license was granted and another casino in the market is being developed. Adding to this is the constant talk out of Chicago of allowing another casino in the city. The removal of the loss limit and success of Lumiere Place has hurt the casinos in Illinois which compete with the St. Louis properties. We believe at least one Chicago area casino and one St. Louis casino could close and the remaining properties would benefit.

While we expect Colorado to be the strongest market in the first half of 2010, the second half marks the anniversary of the change in bet limits, hours and new games, and results will be determined by the economy. Missouri, Mississippi and the local Las Vegas market will be impacted more by the economy than anything else. Markets that will be impacted the most by competition from their borders will be Illinois, Indiana, Atlantic City, Delaware and Connecticut. Pennsylvania and Las Vegas will be the markets impacted the most by competition from within as more capacity has to be absorbed on the Strip by CityCenter and in the Philadelphia market by SugarHouse and the Philadelphia Park expansion.

We believe suppliers once again are in a better position than casinos but the stakes have risen. A rejuvenated IGT will want to gain back the market share they lost by taking their eye off the ball the past few years. WMS and Bally Technologies will want to protect the share they have gained and add to that. While we believe BYI has a product line that will help them gain share, they will have a much easier time in the systems market as we believe the opportunity is there for BYI to become the undisputed leading systems company. While IGT, BYI and WMS slug it out in the slot market, upstarts Konami and Aruze will want to get their percentages in the major markets and Multimedia Games is moving more into what we call the Class II and ½ markets, the non-traditional class III arenas. Shuffle Master and Gaming Partners International have a great opportunity ahead of them as table games expand to new markets in the East and more casinos open in Asia. These are the two primary companies that benefit from an expansion of table games.

We expect the pick up in replacement sales to become apparent by the calendar second quarter of 2010, attracting the interest of investors but the second half of the year’s success or disappointment will be determined by the timing of new opportunities such as Illinois’ video gaming market, new casinos in Kansas and Maryland, VLTs in Italy, casinos in Mexico and expansion in Europe and Brazil. We believe the near term opportunity for investors will be in suppliers but the second half of the year needs more visibility.


Good Luck and Profitable Investing!!

Subscribers Only…Click Here to View The Most Recent Update to The Portfolio.

To Order This Year's Complete Report Click Here

Copyright © 2004 Gaming USA Corp.
Site Design & Development by Nutmeg Interactive
Privacy Policy    Terms & Conditions    Code of Conduct


PO Box 1396 Paramus, New Jersey 07653-1396 - Phone: 1-800-990-1902 Fax: 201-967-7152